Pregnant Woman Perfectly Tells Off Anti-Abortion Protestors

These 'Anti Abortion' people need to GET A LIFE

These ‘Anti Abortion’ people need to GET A LIFE

By @ShaunyGibson – Used to be @ ShaunyNews

I dislike people who judge, pre-judge and take away a persons free will. Abortion is a WOMAN’S CHOICE AND A WOMAN’S RIGHT! Nobody should be filming woman going in and out of clinics like the video below. Here AGAIN we have our good ol’ friend Religion messing with things they refuse to understand. Narrow minded people who have no life so they beat on others. I will debate ANYONE on abortion, but please, understand I live and let live. Be it right or wrong is not for me to say. How a woman comes to the decision to abort is their’s and theirs only, NOBODY should stand in the way. Human right are for the pregnant woman also. I know this is a horrible subject to talk about, but people, mainly religion (THIS IS IN THE UK) is the hardest nut to crack. Why don’t people just leave it be? it won’t stop, abortions WILL still happen. Get over it,for all our sakes and the sake of the Woman who for all YOU KNOW could have been raped, you don’t know the circumstances right?This was in London I believe..This woman who has had or having an abortion is 100% correct, what till the end.

Via Minion Funny on You Tube

Up to date statistics on Abortions via country

Up to date statistics on Abortions via country

Join Ace News Facebook pages:
Living With Fibromyalgia:
Celtic FC:

USA: Obamacare Opens Its Doors Again to Fund ‘Abortions’ With Your Tax Dollars


By @ShaunyGibson – Used to be @ShaunyNews

First I can’t believe you pay a fine if you don’t have ‘Medical Insurance’ and also there is an ‘Abortion Tax” America you are being bent over a bench and screwed. They are coming for your pensions next. I will add a video here by George Carlin and he is 100% correct, from the grave he is telling us all what America is in 2014, it’s a big club for the wealthy who don’t care about the poor. This comes on the back of Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber of MIT health economist saying on record. in a video on the link an inch below “We Passed the Law Thanks to the ‘Stupidity of the American Voter” I mean how much more of this can one country take? I actually agree, I think Obamacare should fund abortion, it will fund everything else and America, you will pay no matter what, this is the new way. Fines for breathing will be next, seriously, you guys best do something, shout, scream, call the police (NO, SUGAR LUMPS, DON’T DO THAT) DO SOMETHING AMERICA…This lad here, speaking from the grave is 100% correct. He is a comedian, people laugh, but I hope people also get the message. Being a singer or a comedian gives you a free pass to tell the truth, and this is good. 1 Minute 10 Seconds in is SPOT ON!

Obamacare Architect: We Passed the Law Thanks to the ‘Stupidity of the American Voter’


Later this week the federal and state exchanges created under Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act, will open for their second year of operation. After last year’s rugged rollout, with extremely expensive web sites that functionedobamacare6 poorly, the Obama Administration has invested millions more in fixing the federal site,, and is promising better performance. It is far from clear that this improvement will happen, and in the area of abortion coverage nothing is clear at all.

Replying to a media question at a recent session with Obamacare allies in Washington, D.C., Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell addressed whether the second year of health care exchanges to be unveiled this November 15 will include information on whether each plan covers abortion on demand. “With regard to the question of this open enrollment,” Burwell mused, “working through the plans that are in place, for the most part, we’re finalizing those plans. So in terms of how the communication is going to work, we’ll have to see how quickly we can get the communication out and where we are.” “We’ll have to see” doesn’t sound reassuring.

The rolling dismissal of the Obama Administration for basic matters of transparency is regrettable.  Lest anyone forget, the Affordable Care Act was passed in early 2010.  A central issue that roiled its final passage was the failure of Congressional Democrats to retain in the bill a comprehensive bipartisan amendment designed to ensure that the ACA excluded funding for abortions and for plans that included elective abortion coverage.

Now, nearly five years later, the fact of widespread subsidies for elective abortion coverage is fully documented, and the many other ways Obamacare expands abortion funding – the largest of them via state Medicaid expansion – are manifest.  Thanks to a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), we know for certain that at least 1,036 health plans offered on the purchasing exchanges, and thus eligible now for massive tax subsidies, cover abortion in any and all circumstances.

The problem is, we know this thanks not to HHS and the $1.7 billion in public monies initially spent on the exchange websites, but to GAO and a request by Hill Republicans that the watchdog agency do what Burwell’s predecessor, Kathleen Sebelius, repeatedly promised would be done and failed to deliver.  What’s more, we know it for plans already chosen by American consumers and already in force – but not for plans that will be online and available for purchase in just a few days.


We know several other things.  Health insurers who are required by law to collect a nominal abortion surcharge from subscribers to these heavily subsidized plans are generally not doing so.  We know this from the GAO report as well, which found that 15 of 18 plans examined were not bothering even with this bookkeeping exercise.  The Administration and many columnists believe the surcharge should assuage taxpayers about involvement in a major expansion of abortion funding.  But imagine yourself as a defendant in a bank robbery arguing that, yes, you bought the getaway car, had advance knowledge of the crime, and stood to benefit from it, but made the bandits pay for their own gas.

Pace Secretary Burwell, we have already seen how “quickly” HHS “can get the communication out” about various features of Obamacare.  It has been agonizingly slow, and many times longer than the time it took the much-less-lavishly-funded GAO to tell us what happened last year in the federal exchanges.

Now a coalition of research groups, including the Charlotte Lozier Institute, has formed once again to ferret out information from insurance companies that should be readily available on each of the plans they sell.  It will be a difficult process.  The insurance companies’ brokers, chat rooms, and plan documents have a way of turning official indifference into everyday obfuscation.

But no one should lose sight of the bottom line.  Obamacare’s limits on abortion funding are a sham and its level of transparency is low.  The law represents a massive shift of values from the ideals of competition, respect for conscience, and preference for life over the destructive alternative of abortion.  There are glitches in the law, but the true glitch in this area is the law.

The real question is, will the new Congress elected on November 4 repeal it?  Soon-to-be Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner wrotepost-election that we can be sure of renewed commitment to repeal it.  That is welcome news, especially if the law is replaced with one that reflects the need for values-driven health plans.  In the meantime – meaning this coming Saturday – health insurance buyers must be able to identify which plans cover elective abortion before they (and you, the taxpayers) sign up for 2015.

Join Ace News Facebook pages:
Living With Fibromyalgia:
Celtic FC:

The Irony of the Anti-Abortion People

Roe V Wade Abortion Anniversary

OK, Head on the block time for Shaun. This is a short simple blog and question. In America there is a HUGE anti-abortion feeling. I respect that. But I am going to show you the Irony America. Let’s say you are a woman and you are raped, you are against abortion, do you abort and keep the kid, or adopt the kid to another family

In many of these anti-Abortion places you have the Death penalty. So I simply ask, what is the difference in “We can’t kill an unborn child” to “We will kill this person as they are bad” Isn’t that a moral outrage right there? I mean how can a person be against killing life in the form of a fetus but be ok to allow the area you live to kill a living person

The irony really makes me see anti abortion people as people with double standards. To kill a life is to kill life in ANY way. Life is life in any way shape or form. How can a person hate the thought of an abortion but be ok with the Death penalty? Do you all see the Irony here? I do and it’s killer. This shows me how stupid many can be in their belief systems. They will believe what they want to believe but deny turning the coin over and seeing the other side of the argument. Blind faith I Call it

Let me know how you feel

More love, less hate